There are a lot of things I’d do if I were an asshole. Fortunately for the world I can live vicariously through Ann Althouse and save myself the trouble.
If I were an asshole, I’d be upset about not being important enough to get invited to a meeting with President Bill Clinton and a handful of the most influential bloggers on the internets. I’d probably respond by attack an attendee for being young, beautiful, and in the presence of Bill Clinton. That’s exactly what Ann Althouse and her legion of misogynistic, anti-feminist commenters have done to the magnificent Jessica Valenti of Feministing.
Well, I’m going to assume Jessica’s contributions to my comments are an attempt at a comic performance, as was her attendence at the luncheon dressed in the guise of Monica Lewinsky.
But that probably wouldn’t be enough to satiate my inexplicable lust to be an asshole.
Jessica: I’m not judging you by your looks. (Don’t flatter yourself.) I’m judging you by your apparent behavior. It’s not about the smiling, but the three-quarter pose and related posturing
Note how in fact Ann does judge Jessica on her looks. And then lies about it through an insulting parenthetical. Very tricky.
Ann has a serious problem with the fact that Jessica has been photographed in a non-mugshot posture - apparently it’s unAmerican or something, Althouse’s logical knots are hard to follow on this one - and right in front of Clinton, no less. Of course the most cursory glance at the photograph in question - the one with dastardly liberal bloggers cavorting with His Holiness Bill Clinton - shows that Jessica’s is glancing sideways because…There. Are. Multiple. Cameras. In. The. Room. I figured this out by removing my Asshole hat and counting no less than seven other bloggers looking in the same direction as Jessica, away from the camera that snapped the picture on Althouse’s blog (of the people I recognize, I’d say that Bill Scher, Barbara from Mahablog, Matt Stoller, Duncan Black, Jeralyn Merritt, McJoan, and John Aravosis are all looking in the same direction as Jessica). OK, my asshole break’s over…
If I were an asshole I’d move beyond simply taking issue with Jessica’s looks and start projecting her devious intentions into my verbal diarrhea discussion of the Clinton meet and greet.
Jessica writes one of those blogs that are all about using breasts for extra attention. Then, when she goes to meet Clinton, she wears a tight knit top that draws attention to her breasts and stands right in front of him and positions herself to make her breasts as obvious as possible?
I wouldn’t stop being an asshole because I’d be sure to forget the fact that it was me, not Jessica, who titled the post “Let’s take a closer look at those breasts.” Clearly Jessica should have gone to meet the president wearing a burkha - by not doing so, she has revealed her intentions to seduce Bill Clinton and every Powerful Man in the room by wearing *gasp* a shirt of short sleeves! Worse still, she has did not dress in a way that was “respectful of the office of the Presidency.”
If I were really trying to be an asshole, though, I’d be sure to throw the reins of my blog over to a legion of asshole commenters who would offer such craptastic analysis as this:
Oh, and the real thing is to point out her compared to the rest of the (much dumpier) females there. They’re standing, she’s posing. [Fatmouse]
Jessica’s younger and better looking. Hence anything she does is pulled from her career as a bitchy supermodel (duh!).
This intern has her line in the water and is trolling for Clinton saying “you can look, but don’t touch the bait!” [David]
Yeah, keep reminding them that being an intern should be license for ass grabbing by men!
and to this day, the feminist movement, IMO, gave up any pretext of principle when they failed to condemn the ex-president for his conduct. As long as you get those abortions on demand, anything else is fair game. [RogerA]
Now we’re cooking with 100% Pure Asshole! Tell him Roger! The women folk got abortion legalized, let’s legalize rape!
And on. And on. And on.
No, the bottom line is that if I were an asshole I’d just put up a post based entirely around the fact that one blogger, who happens to be a young, beautiful, feminist showed up at an event with older, somewhat less beautiful mainstream bloggers and had her picture taken with a former president. I’d allow the comments thread to digress to the point where the subject of my attack has to read discussions of her bust size and comparisons of her dark hair to Monica Lewinsky’s. Just because she’s young and is in a picture with Bill Clinton.
I’d be sure to attack Jessica’s blog layout because the header, like Jessica, has breasts. I’d also attack photographs on Jessica’s blog for containing breasts, even though all photographs of women contain breasts. I’d stroke my beard and wonder, perhaps there’s a common strain here: she has breasts in a picture with Bill Clinton, she has breasts on her blog…EUREKA! She must only blog about breasts!
Emboldened by my realization, I’d take another swipe at her breasts.
I’m sooooooo bored with Jessica’s breasts and they guys who are championing them/her.
My coup de grace in my full-fledged assault of assholeness would surely be recasting my entire critique - and the hard work of my misogynistic commenters - as righteously feminist.
And read my old post that I linked to about how Clinton and feminism. You’re brushing this off and not taking it seriously. I’m laying out a challenge here and you’re engaging in spin, acting like I’m just stooping for a cheap laugh, but that is not so. There is a serious point here, and you’re ignoring it.
Mwwwwaaaaaaaaaaah. I want my sexism serious point addressed and I want it addressed NOW!
As I said above, I’m glad Ann Althouse is here to be an asshole so I don’t have to be one. I’m glad that I know Jessica and consider her a friend (as does Austin). Althouse has zero clue why Jessica would be invited to meet with Clinton. I’m sure Althouse, being someone who got a factually incorrect op-ed published in the Times, has a very astute nose for talent, but has hay fever or something and didn’t take the time to find out that Jessica is a monster in the world of feminism. She has authored columns in The Guardian (factually correct ones, no less). She blogs for one of the largest reproductive rights organizations in America. She is the executive editor of one of the most influential feminist blogs on the internets. In every possible sense she deserved to be in the room with Bill Clinton and other liberal blogging giants. Althouse’s ignorance to these facts undercuts every word that she writes about Jessica and Feministing.
The biggest problem that Althouse and her commenters have is that Jessica is not some unshaven witch that uses feminism as a cudgel because of physical characteristics that Althouse perceives as sufficient for militancy. Here’s a news flash, Ann: feminists don’t look like that. I’ll tell you that Jessica is young and beautiful, and - speaking solely in regards to bloggers I’ve met - so are her cobloggers Vanessa and Celina, Lindsay Beyerstein of Majikthise, Amanda Marcotte of Pandagon, Jill and zuzu of Feministe, and Cooper of WonderlandorNot* - all young and beautiful feminists. This is obviously a big mental stumbling block for Ann and other anti-feminists. Feminism isn’t a product of women’s dissatisfaction with their physical appearance - thus looking good on camera and being a feminist are not contradictory!
Ann Althouse is a fucking asshole for dedicating two posts and comment threads to discussing Jessica, her breasts, and their presence in a photograph with Bill Clinton. Do you really want to know what that photograph means Ann? It means Jessica has kicked so much intellectually-weak, politically regressive, depressingly pathetic ass offered up by the likes of you that she could not possibly be excluded from a major meeting between leading bloggers and Bill Clinton. If you don’t like the fact that she’s finding success with ass whooping for societal change as her profession, you should deal with it in ways that don’t amount to expressing your audacity at her very existence as an attractive feminist.
I’ve never seen a more baseless attack on any blogger than what Ann has levied against Jessica today. I’ll repeat myself, Ann Althouse is a fucking asshole and anyone can quote me on that - I will stand by those words until the day I die.
*I realized I haven’t met Cooper yet, but maybe that will change as we live near each other.
Technorati Tags: Jessica Valenti, Ann Althouse














September 15th, 2006 at 6:38 pm
That was a perceptive catch about the multiple cameras. I think you are right about that. If there were multiple cameras (or even one) my guess is that the shot was arranged by a photographer and or generic group think, and not just be everyone lining up taller in the back, shorter in the front AND JESSICA SHOVING HER TITS IN FRONT OF LEERING BILL the way Althouse and her commenters claim.
If you want to fix your links to point directly to the comment in the thread and not just the top of the thread, at “c” in front of the random big number something like: #c129129182189. I guess Althouse broker her template or something.
Note also you can’t win. If you are deemed to be good looking you are flashing your tits. If you are deemed not to be good looking you are a bull dyke feminist.
September 15th, 2006 at 7:33 pm
Matt, thanks so much for the post. This is some crazy shite. And now, Instapundit has linked to her post! I guess they all have nothing better to talk about than tits.
September 15th, 2006 at 9:31 pm
There are better things to talk about than tits? I guess you learn something new every day.
Seriously, Jessica, the next time you meet Clinton, you really ought to leave your breasts at home. I don’t know what you were thinking.
September 15th, 2006 at 11:15 pm
Bottom line:
Ann is jealous, and is reacting like a Heather in the junior high lunchroom, with a touch of sour grapes thrown in for good measure.
“How DARE she be more popular than me! Not that I care.”
The rest, including her claim that Jessica’s defenders are wilfully ignoring the “serious point” she claims to be making, is just her attempt to deflect from her letting the mask drop. Tell me again, Ann, how many lunches with ex-presidents (or for that matter, any person of importance?) have YOU been invited to?
Ah. I’m beginning to understand things better now.
I am grateful to Ann for one thing, though. Although I knew who most of the other bloggers were, I didn’t know who Jessica was, and had never heard of her blog. Now that I have read it, I’m impressed enough to put it on my “daily read” list.
As for Ann’s blog, she’s proven beyond the shadow of a doubt, in two separate posts, no less, that she is neither worth my linking to or reading. I had my fill of her particular brand of intellectual discourse, as I said above, in junior high school.
September 16th, 2006 at 1:35 am
“Now we’re cooking with 100% Pure Asshole! Tell him Roger! The women folk got abortion legalized, let’s legalize rape!”
That one made me laugh my ass off.
September 16th, 2006 at 3:09 am
Um, I agree totally with the substance of your post. I have to say, though, I’m just a little bit uncomfortable with the emphasis on Jessica being “younger and better looking” than the other women in the picture. Yes, Althouse is slagging Jessica for being young and beautiful and having breasts, and yes, there are tons of young and beautiful feminist bloggers, and I know it’s not your intention or anything, but honestly, what if Jessica were some “unshaven witch”? I dunno, it’s just that, if I were one of the “older, somewhat less beautiful” bloggers pictured, I would be uncomfortable with any implication that whether or not I got a good Hot or Not? rating might affect how I’m perceived in a group of politicians. Again, I know that’s not your intention, and I’m glad Jessica’s getting defended because these attacks suck, I just hate how everything always comes down to how women look, too pretty to be taken seriously, not pretty enough to be taken seriously, prettier than her, uglier than her. The other women in the picture aren’t really relevant to Althouse’s attacks on Jessica imo.
September 16th, 2006 at 3:16 am
[…] I was a ways into writing a long post in similar vein to what I wrote earlier today about the alliterative asshole Ann Althouse when I realized that this whole brouhaha, this assault on Jessica of Feministing (and now Vanessa from Feministing and Jill from Feministe, too) can be summarized quite briefly [Edit: It turns out that this post doesn’t stay short after all]. In fact, Austin already did so in a comment on Althouse’s blog earlier today: Shorter Althouse commenters: I reject Jessica’s intellect because she made my pants move. […]
September 16th, 2006 at 3:25 am
Caritas - Point taken. I actually did struggle with that, but the comparison based on age and beauty originated with Althouse and her commenters. My larger point (as raised in my new post) is that this is only happening because Jessica is young and beautiful. Wingnuts are pissed that she turns them on, hence the attacks.
I’d also add that an important aspect is Jessica’s age, though in a positive sense. To my knowledge she was the youngest blogger there (Jeralyn Merritt’s son is not a blogger). Add to that the fact that she was the only blogger there who writes solely about feminist issues and I think she’s deserving of great praise for her youth. I don’t think that arises in the context of the people she was standing next to, but the blogosphere on whole. She’s done tremendous work and her presence in this meeting is evidence of that.
September 16th, 2006 at 6:44 am
Caritas - “what if Jessica were some “unshaven witch”?”
Althouse wouldn’t have bashed, and we’d not have the discussion then. Take the other women on the photo - no one complains about their appearance.
September 16th, 2006 at 6:47 am
I linked to this triumph of a post. I also lack trackbacking.
September 16th, 2006 at 11:13 pm
Matt, I agree with you, I know Jessica being young and beautiful is why Althouse is attacking her. I’m just, personally, more comfortable saying “Jessica is young and beautiful” than “Jessica is clearly better looking than the other women.” I know the wingnuts were the ones who started down that road. And you are right about the young thing as well.
Myan, I’m not so sure about that. Althouse hates Clinton and wants to make a point about feminists talking to him at all. If she hadn’t been able to go down the “dear god you have BREASTS young lady!” road, she would have found something else to pick on, making fun of whatever feminist was standing in front of Clinton for being whatever she happened to be, maybe a larger size, maybe not so conventionally beautiful, maybe implying that under those pants her legs clearly weren’t shaved. Check out Althouse’s comments, half of them slag Jessica for being too hot and not wearing a burqua, the other half slag her for being “ugly” and not fuckable enough, it’s all two halves of the same coin. Oh, and many of the commenters do slag the other women in the photo’s appearance in passing, btw.
September 17th, 2006 at 7:35 am
Yah, I am starting to feel kind of bad for the -other- women in the pic now. Also ultimately stupid Asshouse’s fault, of course, but….yeah.
What i had said was: the difference is that Jessica is dressed ever-so-slightly less conservatively than the other women, who, let’s face it, are dressed pretty conservatively indeed. So the fuck what? It’s not like Jessica showed up in a sparkly Hello Kitty baby-T and hotpants. But the -other- part of it, which might’ve been more obvious if demento-girl hadn’t gone off raving quite so hard about tits, tits, TITS, is that she -also- really wanted to mock her for her -tacky- -inappropriate- clothing, darling, a T-SHIRT (which it wasn’t). I expect white shoes after Labor Day as well. So on top of being a garden-variety bullying Heather with some serious internalized misogyny -and- a big ol’ green-eyed monster, she’s a pearl-clutching country-club-gatekeeping the-help-are-certainly-getting-uppity-lately biddy as well. Surprise.
And this woman is supposed to be representative of the LEFT in some peoples’ minds, is she?
Easter Bunny save us.
September 17th, 2006 at 7:41 am
and, yah, i am sure that if Jessica -had- showed up in a loose-fitting blazer, she still would’ve been mocked for being brunette and pretty and standing near Bill Clinton. probably then it might’ve gone to I don’t know, fat jokes? (on account of the blazer is so baggy) frumpiness? tacky taste? anything to relentlessly keep her in the Monica boat.
and probably you know the fuckstain could find a way to mock “fat” and still rationalize it as being a sign of her own better commitment to progressive values.
“You have a lot of explaining to do! Don’t you know that there are women who don’t have enough to eat in…um. other countries? Gluttony is so unfeminist…”
September 17th, 2006 at 6:49 pm
i would like to offer a vote of thanks to ann althouse. had it not been for her deeply stupid efforts, i might never have discovered some of the fine blogs that have responded to her ignorance. as a middle aged guy, i am still merrily trying to learn and improve my life. back in university i had a faculty adviser who mirrored the althouse brand of pit bull, pseudo-feminism. youth, talent and a nice smile were an affront to her. to be honest, she put me off feminism as a progressive movement for quite a while. the example which she forced on those around her was that feminism was intended to make people ugly, unhappy and bitter. she used her influence to quell any notions of humour and intelligence that had the audacity to appear. and she was perfectly happy to wave her finger under the nose of any of the women in the department that failed to drape themselves in beige and gloom. as a man, well, i was just a rapist waiting to happen.
as for althouse’s “substantive arguments”, all i could figure was that she was attacking a young woman for being attractive in an effort to reduce the entirety of the clinton presidency to a blow job. i have since come to learn that feminism is not one thing or one issue. it is about fairness, equality and opportunity. the voices here, at feministing and elsewhere (especially lindsay beyerstein’s eloquent response) only serve to prove that. as a commenter elsewhere noted, althouse is an asshat, which is the appropriate chapeau to cover shit for brains.
cheers
September 18th, 2006 at 8:21 am
>i would like to offer a vote of thanks to ann althouse. had it not been for her deeply stupid efforts, i might never have discovered some of the fine blogs that have responded to her ignorance.
Yes, that is very true.
September 18th, 2006 at 8:31 am
lazio pink & belledame222 - I’m glad that you’ve found some good sites out of this whole thing, but unlike Althouse I couldn’t give a rats ass about traffic. I’d be much happier to have not had my friends sexually harassed and demeaned in the most public of ways than get the 1000-odd hits this kerfuffle has brought this blog.
I hope you enjoy this site and please do stick around, but the baseness of Althouse and the other wingnuts who weight in on Jessica, Vanessa, and Jill’s physical appearance goes beyond any gains in readership I might experience. They’re fucking assholes and I’d be much happier not dealing with the assholes’ ruminations.
September 18th, 2006 at 11:27 am
and now I am thinking Peter Paul and Mary really need to have a reunion:
“If I had an ass-hole, I’d ex-crete in the mo-or-ning,
i’d ex-crete in the eeeeeeve-ning, all over this la-and…
I’d sing of FREEDOM FRIES!
I’d sing of “stooooone the SLUT,”
I’d sing of the hate, between, my brothers and my sisters,
All o-o-ver, all over this la-a-a-and, crap all OVER this la-a-and…”
September 18th, 2006 at 11:28 am
Sure, thanks! likewise! I’ve linked you.
and yeah, I hear you; but, well, i dunno.
as Ma Ingalls or Plato or Sideshow Bob or someone once said,
“There is no great loss without some small gain.”
and anyway I think finding good -people- is in fact not all that small at all.
September 18th, 2006 at 11:29 am
(above should really probably be if i WERE an asshole…
i am working on the “I Blame The Assholes Manifesto; you and Veronica have inspired me. later tonight, perhaps).
September 18th, 2006 at 12:55 pm
I cannot wait to see that Manifesto as I too blame the assholes.
Also, “Fetch me my axe” is a phenomenal name for a blog.
September 18th, 2006 at 1:52 pm
Thank you! there’s actually a little backstory on that, somewhere in the sidebar, “Origins of the name”
March 27th, 2007 at 8:28 am
[…] Ann Althouse, during a meltdown on BloggingHeads TV after Garance Franke-Ruta of TAPPED mentioned Althouse’s attacks on Jessica Valenti following the blogger meeting with Bill Clinton in September: I don’t like it being brought up as just a way to undermine me and make me look bad in an out of context way…You are on a blog TAPPED that includes these people who do things like this. If I searched TAPPED for my name I’d find vicious things about me that are disconnected from anything that I recognize about myself and that has no connection to any attempt to try to persuade me, or include me, or convince me to be on that side. It just seems to be dominated by vicious, ugly people. […]